Grease 2 is a cult classic movie that hit the screens in 1982, and even though it never enjoyed the same success as the original Grease film, it has a dedicated fan base. The film is known for its catchy songs, high-energy dance scenes, and of course, its fashion. However, one of the costume designers has recently come forth to defend a particular wardrobe choice that has left some fans scratching their heads.

In a recent interview with The Guardian, the film’s costume designer Albert Wolsky addressed one of the most talked-about costumes of the movie. The scene in question shows the character of Stephanie Zinone, played by Michelle Pfeiffer, wearing a jacket with the letter “T” on the back instead of a “P” for Pink Ladies, the iconic group in Grease and Grease 2.

This wardrobe decision has been a point of criticism for many fans of the movie, with some even calling it a careless mistake on the part of the costume designers. However, Wolsky stands by the choice, stating that it was intentional.

Wolsky explains that the decision to put a “T” on Stephanie’s jacket was to show that she was trying to break away from the Pink Ladies and establish her identity. Wolsky says, “We put a ‘T’ on her jacket because she’s trying to be an individual, but, of course, the Pink Ladies have to come in, and she has to rejoin the group.”

Wolsky’s explanation sheds new light on the apparent wardrobe mistake that some fans have criticized in the past. It shows that the costume designers put a lot of thought into the characters’ wardrobe and were deliberate in their choices.

It is not uncommon for filmmakers to make intentional wardrobe decisions to convey certain themes or ideas. In fact, some iconic movie costumes, such as the red leather outfit worn by Trinity in The Matrix or the yellow tracksuit worn by Uma Thurman in Kill Bill, have become as much a part of popular culture as the films themselves.

In conclusion, the Grease 2 costume designer’s decision to put a “T” on Stephanie’s jacket instead of a “P” was a deliberate choice that was meant to convey an important message. While some may still view it as a wardrobe blunder, it is clear that the costume designers were intentional in their decision-making process, and it adds another layer of depth to the film’s characters and themes.